Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:50684 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751047AbaIISaP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:30:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:27:34 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Sergey Ryazanov Cc: Paul Bolle , Jiri Slaby , Nick Kossifidis , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Oleksij Rempel , Richard Weinberger , Jonathan Bither , Hauke Mehrtens , ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, open@hauke-m.de, "list@hauke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , "antonynpavlov@gmail.com" , OpenWrt Development List , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "list@hauke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/28] Remove ATHEROS_AR231X Message-ID: <20140909182734.GJ29412@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20140909_203044_047625_8F1D9F96) References: <20140213201421.GJ22203@tuxdriver.com> <1397581703.8212.5.camel@x220> <1403087119.1984.93.camel@x220> <1403091974.1984.102.camel@x220> <1409911856.7832.9.camel@x220> <1409916824.7832.20.camel@x220> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: > 2014-09-05 15:33 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle : > > Hi Sergey, > > > > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:12 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: > >> 2014-09-05 14:10 GMT+04:00, Paul Bolle : > >> > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:46 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> >> Having this conversation every rc1 is getting a bit silly. Could Jiri > >> >> e.a. perhaps set some specific deadline for ATHEROS_AR231X to be > >> >> submitted? > >> > > >> > I waited until rc3. Have you seen any activity on this front? If not, > >> > should I resend the patch that removes the code in mainline that depends > >> > on ATHEROS_AR231X (ie, AHB bus support)? > >> > > >> Recent activity always could be found in [1]. Now I finish another one > >> round of cleanups and have a plan to fix several things (you can > >> always find something that you really want to improve). But if you > >> insist I could immediately switch to "send upstream" mode. And seems > >> that this would be better approach. > >> > >> 1. https://dev.openwrt.org/log/trunk/target/linux/atheros > > > > And where can the related PULL requests or patch submissions be found? > > > I have not sent patches yet, since I thought that it would be easier > to cleanup them in openwrt tree and then send them upstream. That excuse has worn a bit thin. Perhaps Paul should repost his removal and you can add a revert to the start of your patch series? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.