Return-path: Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]:54521 "EHLO mail-yk0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751232AbaIEMCb (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:02:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1409916824.7832.20.camel@x220> References: <1391971686-9517-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1391971686-9517-10-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <52F7D480.1050106@hauke-m.de> <52F7DF21.70207@nod.at> <52F8C373.9060108@rempel-privat.de> <20140213201421.GJ22203@tuxdriver.com> <1397581703.8212.5.camel@x220> <1403087119.1984.93.camel@x220> <1403091974.1984.102.camel@x220> <1409911856.7832.9.camel@x220> <1409916824.7832.20.camel@x220> From: Sergey Ryazanov Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:02:10 +0400 Message-ID: (sfid-20140905_140254_497644_5CD3ED89) Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/28] Remove ATHEROS_AR231X To: Paul Bolle Cc: Jiri Slaby , Nick Kossifidis , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "John W. Linville" , Oleksij Rempel , Richard Weinberger , Jonathan Bither , Hauke Mehrtens , ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, open@hauke-m.de, "list@hauke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , "antonynpavlov@gmail.com" , OpenWrt Development List , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "list@hauke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2014-09-05 15:33 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle : > Hi Sergey, > > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:12 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: >> 2014-09-05 14:10 GMT+04:00, Paul Bolle : >> > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:46 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: >> >> Having this conversation every rc1 is getting a bit silly. Could Jiri >> >> e.a. perhaps set some specific deadline for ATHEROS_AR231X to be >> >> submitted? >> > >> > I waited until rc3. Have you seen any activity on this front? If not, >> > should I resend the patch that removes the code in mainline that depends >> > on ATHEROS_AR231X (ie, AHB bus support)? >> > >> Recent activity always could be found in [1]. Now I finish another one >> round of cleanups and have a plan to fix several things (you can >> always find something that you really want to improve). But if you >> insist I could immediately switch to "send upstream" mode. And seems >> that this would be better approach. >> >> 1. https://dev.openwrt.org/log/trunk/target/linux/atheros > > And where can the related PULL requests or patch submissions be found? > I have not sent patches yet, since I thought that it would be easier to cleanup them in openwrt tree and then send them upstream. -- BR, Sergey