Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]:46068 "EHLO
	sabertooth01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754354AbaJHLG5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 8 Oct 2014 07:06:57 -0400
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:38:44 +0530
From: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
CC: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix kernel panic while shutting down AP
Message-ID: <20141008110842.GC25666@qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20141008_130700_644880_8557A64C)
References: <1412759786-10567-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com>
 <CA+BoTQ=K=F5TodrmuaEaJfErFx1=BL-bmPDrAaeMLjjb8c3fJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141008103312.GA25666@qca.qualcomm.com>
 <CA+BoTQmVsyuxjvc_s-BC6ZwRWk3ACG0CvDYHJRnZ7OqY6W1Upw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQmVsyuxjvc_s-BC6ZwRWk3ACG0CvDYHJRnZ7OqY6W1Upw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:50:28PM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 8 October 2014 12:33, Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:45:38AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:
> >> On 8 October 2014 11:16, Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> >> > The commit "ath10k: workaround fw beaconing bug" is freeing
> >> > DMA-coherent memory in irq context which is hitting BUG ON
> >> > in ARM platforms. Fix this by moving dma_free out of spin
> >> > lock.
> >>
> >> I hardly see how moving the freeing outside the spinlock is a fix.
> >>
> >>
> >> > kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:1512!
> >> > Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
> >> > CPU: 0 PID: 722 Comm: hostapd Not tainted 3.14.0 #3
> >> > task: dd58b840 ti: da6a6000 task.ti: da6a6000
> >> > PC is at vunmap+0x24/0x34
> >> > LR is at __arm_dma_free.isra.21+0x12c/0x190
> >> > [<c02a97d0>] (vunmap) from [<c021f81c>] (__arm_dma_free.isra.21+0x12c/0x190)
> >> > [<c021f81c>] (__arm_dma_free.isra.21) from [<bf3b2440>]
> >> >                         (ath10k_mac_vif_beacon_free+0xf4/0x100 [ath10k_core])
> >> > [<bf3b2440>] (ath10k_mac_vif_beacon_free [ath10k_core]) from [<bf3b2490>]
> >> >                         (ath10k_remove_interface+0x44/0x1ec [ath10k_core])
> >> > [<bf3b2490>] (ath10k_remove_interface [ath10k_core]) from [<bf3352e4>]
> >> >                         (ieee80211_add_virtual_monitor+0x9d8/0x9f0 [mac80211])
> >> > [<bf3352e4>] (ieee80211_add_virtual_monitor [mac80211]) from [<bf33530c>]
> >> >                         (ieee80211_stop+0x10/0x18 [mac80211])
> >> > [<bf33530c>] (ieee80211_stop [mac80211]) from [<c040d144>]
> >> >                         (__dev_close_many+0x9c/0xcc)
> >>
> >>  1. How can even ieee80211_add_virtual_monitor() call
> >> ath10k_remove_interface()? Upstream ath10k doesn't advertise
> >> IEEE80211_HW_WANT_MONITOR_VIF. This call trace is either invalid,
> >> you're not using upstream ath10k and/or have custom patches applied to
> >> ath10k.
> >>
> > This is the backtrace captured on panic and we are getting the same
> > backtrace consistently. I confirmed that add_virtual_monitor is not
> > called for ath10k as it is not advertising. ath10k_remove_interface is
> > called for master mode.
> >
> >>  2. How can ieee80211_stop() be called from an interrupt context
> >> anyway? ieee80211_stop() calls ieee80211_do_stop() which calls
> >> ieee80211_roc_purge() which tries to get a hold of local->mtx. This
> >> implies ieee80211_stop() isn't design to be run in an interrupt
> >> context to begin with so I don't see why ath10k should even care if
> >> ath10k_remove_interface() is called in an interrupt context at this
> >> point.
> >>
> > in_interrupt is counting soft and hard irqs. ieee80211_stop is not
> > called from interrupt context. In ath10k, by aquiring spin_lock in
> > ath10k_mac_vif_beacon_free is increasing soft irq count.
> >
> > In ARM arch, __arm_dma_free is calling vunmap which might sleep. So it
> > can not be called within spin_lock.
> 
> Did you try using GFP_ATOMIC in the dma_alloc_coherent instead of
> moving the spinlock?
>
Nope. The problem is while freeing dma memory not during allocation.
dma_free_coherent won't take any GFP_* flags.
> 
> >
> > Similar to dma_alloc_coherent, dma_free_coherent can not be called under
> > soft irq context.
> 
> The call trace points to ath10k_mac_vif_beacon_free() which doesn't
> use dma_free_coherent() so why are you blaming it for the BUG_ON?
> 
I agree the calltrace is a bogus. ath10k_mac_vif_beacon_cleanup is
calling dma_free_coherent.

> If anything the offender should be dma_unmap_single() but the thing is
> beacon_buf is always allocated for AP/IBSS now which means
> dma_unmap_single() is never called. For non-AP/IBSS both arvif->beacon
> and arvif->beacon_buf are always NULL so neither
> dma_alloc/free_coherent nor dma_map/unmap_single are called.
>
Agree. We need one more check in ath10k_mac_vif_beacon_free. But here
the problem is dma_free_coherent is being called from soft irq context
which is not allowed (BUG_ON noted in ARM arch).

After moving dma_free_coherent out of spinlock, the kernel
BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:1512 is never hit.

-Rajkumar