Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:39144 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752423AbaJWNU3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:20:29 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ex7so1782445wid.16 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:20:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1413807758-30249-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> References: <1413807758-30249-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:20:28 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20141023_152040_165032_3423039C) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ath10k: speed up recovery From: Michal Kazior To: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Cc: linux-wireless , Michal Kazior Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20 October 2014 14:22, Michal Kazior wrote: > Patch #1 fixes a bug I've found while testing > patches #2 and #3. It's safe to cherry-pick it in > case patches #2 and/or #3 aren't accepted or need > a re-spin. > > I've mainly used patch #2 to test reset and > recovery. It's pretty handy for (stress-)testing. > > Patch #3 should improve recovery speed in some > cases. Notably when there's a long chain of WMI > commands involved which take a painfully long time > to timeout/complete if firmware crashes mid-way. > > Note: Patches #2 and #3 depend on `ath10k: pci > related fixes 2014-10-09`. Without the patchset > patches #2 and #3 must not be applied. Patch #1 is > fine though. Do not apply this patchset yet, please. I need to do a minor fix in the 'ath10k: fix possible bmi crash' regarding warm reset patch from the other patchset. Michał