Return-path: Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:37775 "EHLO mail-vc0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753741AbaJDBG2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 21:06:28 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hy4so1407263vcb.0 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:06:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1412251000-25377-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> References: <1412251000-25377-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:06:27 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20141004_030633_513336_C88F2B9C) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: don't create bssid peer for ibss From: Yeoh Chun-Yeow To: Janusz Dziedzic Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > It's not really necessary to create bssid peer for > bssid. Self-address peer is sufficient. > > This prevents some firmware revisions from crashing. > Which firmware? AFAIK, only firmware version 636 supports adhoc, right? --- Chun-Yeow