Return-path: Received: from smtp06.msg.oleane.net ([62.161.4.6]:46590 "EHLO smtp06.msg.oleane.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753367AbaJMMH5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:07:57 -0400 From: "voncken" To: "'Michal Kazior'" Cc: , "'linux-wireless'" References: <773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A319018C2750@sbs2003.acksys.local> <024a01cfe6c7$5e427dd0$1ac77970$@acksys.fr> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: ath10k firmware crash Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:06:51 +0200 Message-ID: <025801cfe6de$2d4c7f70$87e57e50$@acksys.fr> (sfid-20141013_140801_666243_0C2A36E2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > > > Have you a benchmark reference with ATH10K ? at this time we can send > around 700 Mbit/s, is it the maximum or we can expected better ? > > If this is OTA then this is pretty good. If this is cabled RF w/ attentuator > it should be possible to get ~900mbps of UDP traffic with multiple streams on > iperf. At least that's what I was getting on 10.1 firmware (on both AP and > STA) last time I checked. > > Getting more than 700mbps OTA requires AP and STA antenna alignment voodoo. > I did some tests with a linksys WRT1900AC and I have ~950 mbps OTA easily. > > MichaƂ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html