Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:39961 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750935AbaJaIQ5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:16:57 -0400 Message-ID: <1414743414.2918.12.camel@jrissane-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (sfid-20141031_091702_066946_52058DF5) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211-hwsim: add frequency attribute to netlink pkts From: Jukka Rissanen To: Johannes Berg Cc: greearb@candelatech.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:16:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1414742686.3014.15.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1414447486-10385-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <1414742568.2918.11.camel@jrissane-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <1414742686.3014.15.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Johannes, On pe, 2014-10-31 at 09:04 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 10:02 +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote: > > > while rebasing my hwsim patches on top of Ben's patches, I noticed that > > the freq attribute is not mentioned in hwsim_genl_policy struct. The > > same applies also to radio name and vif attributes. Just wondered should > > they be mentioned in the policy struct like the other attributes? > > Hmm, yes, they should be there. It's only important for the name, I > guess, but better have them all. I can fix it or would you like to send > a patch? Please fix it so it gets applied faster :) Cheers, Jukka