Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:48606 "EHLO mail-wi0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755416AbaJXPYP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:24:15 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id d1so1565627wiv.0 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Adrien Decostre Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:23:33 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20141024_172420_373480_F824C2D6) Subject: Questions regarding ath9k and new EN 300 328 regulation To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dear all, I am looking for information about the compliancy of the ath9k driver to the EN 300 328 ETSI regulation. Would someone know if ath9k has already been tested for this regulation? Is it needed to enable any specific flag in ath9k to guarantee compliancy to the adaptivity tests described in EN 300 328? I already tried by applying the patches “ath9k: Fix regulatory compliance” (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg115798.html) and “ath9k: Fix ETSI compliance for AR9462 2.0” (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg118665.html) but this does not seem to be sufficient. Many thanks in advance for any help Best regards