Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:35601 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752708AbaJTH2J (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 03:28:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1413790086.10246.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20141020_092813_425937_BFEABC7D) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: minstrels: fix buffer overflow in HT debugfs rc_stats From: Johannes Berg To: Karl Beldan Cc: Karl Beldan , linux-wireless , Felix Fietkau Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:28:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20141019102255.GA30711@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> (sfid-20141019_122307_210658_6460AF92) References: <1413570840-27679-1-git-send-email-karl.beldan@gmail.com> <20141019102255.GA30711@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> (sfid-20141019_122307_210658_6460AF92) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 12:22 +0200, Karl Beldan wrote: > This would require rebasing "[PATCH v3 4/4] mac80211: minstrel_ht: add > basic support for VHT rates <= 3SS@80MHz", and send > > [PATCH v2] mac80211: minstrels: fix buffer overflow in HT debugfs > [PATCH v4 1/4] mac80211: minstrel_ht: Increase the range of handled > [PATCH v4 2/4] mac80211: minstrel_ht: macros adjustments for future > [PATCH v4 3/4] mac80211: minstrel_ht: include type (cck/ht) in rates > [PATCH v4 4/4] mac80211: minstrel_ht: add basic support for VHT rates > > Is it ok ? Who are you asking? Those are your own patches, no? So are you asking yourself if you can rebase? ;-) For me that's fine. johannes