Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:63104 "EHLO mail-oi0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932543AbaJWDfb (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:35:31 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a141so129168oig.34 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:35:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5447CF6D.3010401@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:35:30 +0500 Message-ID: (sfid-20141023_053535_821476_F3391133) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation From: Kamran Nishat To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Ali Abedi , "(ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org)" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I think you should look in earlier drivers from Atheors. Because this delayed BA for separate packets was introduced before 802.11n in 802.11e perhaps. On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :( > > > -adrian > > > On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated, >> single packets) and then ask >> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been >> implemented in ath9k or if >> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications. >> >> What I need: >> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK >> >> Best, >> Ali >> _______________________________________________ >> ath9k-devel mailing list >> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org >> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel