Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:45915 "EHLO mail-wg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932381AbaJWDSn (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:18:43 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l18so151341wgh.29 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:18:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5447CF6D.3010401@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> References: <5447CF6D.3010401@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:18:41 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20141023_051846_372844_C5289F16) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation From: Adrian Chadd To: Ali Abedi Cc: "(ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org)" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :( -adrian On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi wrote: > Hello, > > I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated, > single packets) and then ask > for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been > implemented in ath9k or if > it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications. > > What I need: > Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK > > Best, > Ali > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel