Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:51575 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750780AbaKYPRq (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:17:46 -0500 Message-ID: <1416928659.2045.8.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20141125_161749_633505_888F4D0B) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: check if channels allow 80 MHz for VHT probe requests From: Johannes Berg To: YanBo Cc: linux-wireless , j@w1.fi, Kalle Valo Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:17:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20141125_154908_659671_DFA9C862) References: (sfid-20141125_154908_659671_DFA9C862) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Agree with you that it need a bigger discussion about whether > advertise VHT is the suitable/best > way to support the VHT at 2.4G feature. > > We are considered this ways as it is already be used by some vendor > like BRCM or Qualcomm Atheros > in there full mac product, and there will be IOT issue if there are > kinds of different implementation. There's no forum that defines it and tests IOP though... johannes