Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:65447 "EHLO mail-wg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756396AbaKTOtL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:49:11 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so3911228wgg.14 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:49:10 -0800 (PST) From: Francesco Gringoli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Broadcom Corporation BCM43228 802.11a/b/g/n In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:49:08 +0100 Cc: Ruben De Smet , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , b43-dev Message-Id: (sfid-20141120_154925_454294_976D50A3) References: <546DE1DB.7090900@telenet.be> To: =?utf-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Nov 20, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 20 November 2014 13:43, Ruben De Smet wrote: >> This will be the last day I'm using my Broadcom Corporation BCM43228 >> 802.11a/b/g/n miniPCI WiFi card, as I'm switching to a faster Intel AC card. >> Is there any interest in the linux-wireless or b43 community to have >> this device for reverse engineering purposes? I'm able to send it for free. > > Did you test this device with b43? Were there any problems with it? By the way, I have been using a few 43228 in monitor mode with b43 and they were hanging pretty randomly (I was using 3.16.0-wl that time, apparently they were stopping receiving but they were still able to transmit). Although they work much better than 43224, especially with 48Mb/s and 54Mb/s and with higher MCS (especially with two streams), the 43224 seemed to be more stable. Best, -Francesco > > _______________________________________________ > b43-dev mailing list > b43-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev