Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:40684 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752570AbaKDJaW (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:30:22 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ex7so8684931wid.10 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 01:30:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1415090436-12588-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> From: Krishna Chaitanya Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:00:00 +0530 Message-ID: (sfid-20141104_103033_848210_1BE500D6) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Increase uapsd max SP frames number To: "Otcheretianski, Andrei" Cc: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Otcheretianski, Andrei > wrote: >> The spec doesn't require unlimited to be really "unlimited" and the AP decides when to end the SP, so any value here is ok. >> However for large traffic bursts increasing this value looks reasonable. Also looks like some certification tests expect more frames to be delivered during SP. >> 128 is still kind of arbitrary value >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Krishna Chaitanya [mailto:chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 11:03 >>> To: Grumbach, Emmanuel >>> Cc: Johannes Berg; linux-wireless; Otcheretianski, Andrei >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Increase uapsd max SP frames number >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Grumbach >>> wrote: >>> > From: Andrei Otcheretianski >>> > >>> > Deliver up to 128 frames during SP instead of 8 if unlimited max SP is >>> > specified during association. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski >>> > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach >>> > --- >>> > net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 2 +- >>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> > >>> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c index >>> > de494df..3352741 100644 >>> > --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c >>> > +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c >>> > @@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ void ieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_uapsd(struct >>> sta_info *sta) >>> > break; >>> > case 0: >>> > /* XXX: what is a good value? */ >>> > - n_frames = 8; >>> > + n_frames = 128; >>> > break; >>> > } >>> What is criteria for deciding the threshold? >>> Any specific use case for 128? > I understand, thanks for the explanation. can we add the reason (certification) to the commit log? It will be easy to understand the change.