Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:44772 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751268AbaLURPS (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:15:18 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:07:23 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Arend van Spriel Cc: Kalle Valo , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfc@ml01.01.org, "David S. Miller" , lwn@lwn.net Subject: Re: changes to Linux wireless maintenance Message-ID: <20141221170722.GA28648@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20141221_181522_674427_AC27B3B0) References: <87388d2tbn.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <549697F0.8090506@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <549697F0.8090506@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:50:40AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >The trees work similarly like John's wireless and wireless-next trees, the > >former only for important bugfixes to -rc releases and the latter for the > >rest going to the next release. > > So are you dropping the wireless-testing tree? From earlier IRC discussion I > figured that tree was still in demand. I still plan to maintain a version of wireless-testing for some amount of time. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.