Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:39478 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752941AbbAOXDa (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:03:30 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z2so609289wiv.3 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:03:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <21687.32167.596541.729136@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <1420432796-10765-1-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org> <87r3uy4t9y.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <21685.35179.110539.780864@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87bnm01ojf.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <21687.29026.962216.812998@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87vbk8zcr1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <21687.30578.746681.850817@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87mw5kzbog.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <21687.32167.596541.729136@gargle.gargle.HOWL> From: Julian Calaby Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:03:08 +1100 Message-ID: (sfid-20150116_000333_762155_321401AB) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Make HTT fill size configurable To: Sujith Manoharan Cc: Kalle Valo , ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Sujith, On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Kalle Valo wrote: >> Yeah, but everyone want higher throughput (including me). So what value >> is best in your opinion? > > Lower throughput has been okay for all this time, with a value > of 16. I suppose the value can be retained to not cause regressions > on AP135 or other platforms with a low-powered CPU. As Michal mentioned, > this value allows AP135 to function without the watchdog rebooting > the board. Can we detect if this parameter is too high / low and adjust / limit it on the fly? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/