Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]:42221 "EHLO sabertooth01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751318AbbAMOoz (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:44:55 -0500 From: Kalle Valo To: Sujith Manoharan CC: Michal Kazior , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Make HTT fill size configurable References: <1420432796-10765-1-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org> <21677.3195.451116.244389@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:44:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <21677.3195.451116.244389@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Sujith Manoharan's message of "Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:07:47 +0530") Message-ID: <87zj9m4u5h.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20150113_154506_360943_B676E70D) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sujith Manoharan writes: >> I have a patch internally which removes the replenishment tasklet and >> I wonder how will it behave with rx batching then, hmm.. > > I tried that earlier and could see only marginal improvement. The biggest > increase came when I replaced netif_receive_skb() with netif_rx() > in mac80211/rx.c. Any ideas why that increases throughput? -- Kalle Valo