Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:35322 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752434AbbALJ61 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:58:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1421056704.1891.18.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150112_105832_779322_03F31584) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Allow to set net namespace for wireless device via RTM_LINK From: Johannes Berg To: Vadim Kochan Cc: Marcel Holtmann , linux-wireless Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:58:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20150112_105719_498905_EF48834D) References: <1410467723-2550-1-git-send-email-vadim4j@gmail.com> <1411075535.2034.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20141014121627.GA5115@angus-think.lan> <1413798437.10246.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <128188DF-5A9B-47A5-8A89-974CF7CF9064@holtmann.org> <1413802344.10246.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1420449724.1898.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1421055751.1891.10.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150112_105719_498905_EF48834D) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:57 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote: > Thank you! Seems reasonably for me. > > The question is not related to the thread: > May be this is not very good idea to copy behavior from other > tools but what do you think about > add the same ability to use named network namespaces as it is > done in iproute2 - from /var/run/netns ? I have no objection to that of course - I believe it didn't exist back when I wrote this code, or at least I didn't know about it then :) johannes