Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:8764 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751045AbbAOIcr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 03:32:47 -0500 From: Kalle Valo To: Sujith Manoharan CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Make HTT fill size configurable References: <1420432796-10765-1-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org> <87r3uy4t9y.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <21685.35179.110539.780864@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87bnm01ojf.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <21687.29026.962216.812998@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87vbk8zcr1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <21687.30578.746681.850817@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:32:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <21687.30578.746681.850817@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Sujith Manoharan's message of "Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:46:50 +0530") Message-ID: <87mw5kzbog.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20150115_093250_893071_930B3331) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sujith Manoharan writes: > Kalle Valo wrote: >> I STILL don't know what values you think people should use with >> the htt_fill parameter. > > None. The default stays the same. But, it can be adjusted based > on the platform, if higher throughput is desired. Yeah, but everyone want higher throughput (including me). So what value is best in your opinion? -- Kalle Valo