Message-ID: <1423141383.31870.39.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> (sfid-20150205_140312_642098_1A20AB9B)
Subject: Re: Throughput regression with `tcp: refine TSO autosizing`
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	eyalpe@dev.mellanox.co.il
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:03:03 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQnwcmu=YbKB17JQb7ZPwGZoQS7zQ6nT-WEJHjnBX34QKA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+BoTQkVu23P3EOmY_Q3E1GJnWsyF==Pawz4iPOS_Bq5dvfO5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1422537297.21689.15.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <CA+BoTQk2xT-8DqPuiiKG+kHAjLPrj8F9dLTb-rcGhvMq0u_2Qw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1422628835.21689.95.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <CA+BoTQkV+mOZfe_Niz5101sMQeaV6muKCsShptjGQ1AgOHqqoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1422903136.21689.114.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <1422926330.21689.138.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <CA+BoTQkMikA8wxm1ce2DkKhPB0HiKeAqT7f+sQ=91W40z=X0Rg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1422973660.907.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <CA+BoTQmvUuFdfYF=wVMYxrf_nQZB5GCV=LvDZVvfs-3hAE4WKw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1423051045.907.108.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <CA+BoTQ=BDcQ779uKCuX+f40=4npXVF4MTQnpjKimNYAxPsxBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1423053531.907.115.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <CA+BoTQ=qmCZz4CmSOvCOzMLowrDEG12XBffkTcYxjGqVD9604g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1423055810.907.125.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <1423056591.907.130.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <1423084303.31870.15.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <CA+BoTQnwcmu=YbKB17JQb7ZPwGZoQS7zQ6nT-WEJHjnBX34QKA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 07:46 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 4 February 2015 at 22:11, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Most conservative patch would be :
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> > index 9c782a42665e1aaf43bfbca441631ee58da50c09..6a36317d6bb0447202dee15528130bd5e21248c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> > @@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ void ath10k_htt_t2h_msg_handler(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >                 break;
> >         }
> >         case HTT_T2H_MSG_TYPE_TX_COMPL_IND:
> > +               skb_orphan(skb);
> >                 spin_lock_bh(&htt->tx_lock);
> >                 __skb_queue_tail(&htt->tx_compl_q, skb);
> >                 spin_unlock_bh(&htt->tx_lock);
> 
> I suppose you want to call skb_orphan() on actual data packets, right?
> This skb is just a host-firmware communication buffer.

Right. I have no idea how you find the actual data packet at this stage.