Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]:52547 "EHLO mail-lb0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965839AbbBDPff convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:35:35 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w7so2161129lbi.1 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:35:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1423052124.4741.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <54CFF0B3.1060507@gmail.com> <1422953213.2237.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> <54D20B43.9060506@gmail.com> <1423052124.4741.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:35:33 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20150204_163543_856474_C1E0A2E5) Subject: Re: broken URLs of iwlwifi firmware tarballs From: Emmanuel Grumbach To: Johannes Berg Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltw61yIMSMdW7DoXQ=?= , linux-wireless , Nix Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 13:06 +0100, Vladimír Čunát wrote: >> On 02/03/2015 09:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: >> > I've fixed that now. >> >> Thanks! >> >> For future reference, is it the case that fetching from (c)git is the >> preferred way of distributing the firmware? (preferred by you, i.e.p >> *.kernel.org) > > We publish both, so it doesn't really matter. > Yeah but I typically publish on the git tree earlier since it is easier :) Not really significant though.