Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:43640 "EHLO mail-wg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752194AbbBAEwv (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2015 23:52:51 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id k14so33244732wgh.8 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:52:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54CDB120.50002@gmail.com> (sfid-20150201_055327_856653_B34A9524) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 05:52:48 +0100 From: poma MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Finger , linux-wireless Subject: Re: Realtek RTL8812AE 802.11ac References: <54CC73E2.3040208@gmail.com> <54CD1871.80409@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: <54CD1871.80409@lwfinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 31.01.2015 19:01, Larry Finger wrote: > On 01/31/2015 12:19 AM, poma wrote: >> >> Salutem >> >> >> Is the combination with Bluetooth only essential difference between RTL8821AE and RTL8812AE? >> >> *If* the undermentioned two devices are based on RTL8812AE chipset, >> whether they supported via 'rtl8821ae.ko' & 'rtl8821aefw.bin'? >> >> PCIe RTL8812AE 802.11abgn+ac 2x2:2 >> >> >> Amped Wireless PCI20E (FCC ID: ZTT-PCI20E) >> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Amped_Wireless_PCI20E >> >> - High Power AC1200 Wi-Fi PCI-E Adapter >> PCI20E >> http://www.ampedwireless.com/products/pci20e.html >> >> - http://www.amazon.com/Amped-Wireless-AC1200-Adapter-PCI20E/dp/B00I9AS1JA >> >> >> D-Link DWA-582 rev A1 (FCC ID: KA2WA582A1) >> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DWA-582_rev_A1 >> >> - Wireless AC1200 Dual Band PCIe Desktop Adapter >> DWA-582 >> http://www.dlink.com.au/home-solutions/wireless-ac1200-dual-band-pcie-desktop-adapter >> >> - http://www.amazon.com/WIRELESS-AC1200-EXPRESS-ADAPTER-DUAL/dp/B00PHVQV14 > > Both RTL8812AE and RTL8821AE have wifi and Bluetooth. There is a difference in > the radio structure. The 8812 has the potential to handle 867 Mbps - the 8821 > only half that rate. In any case, driver rtl8821ae handles both devices, and the > firmware is the same. One other difference is that I have not tested the 8812 as > I only have 8821 devices. > > One other difference is that the firmware can handle BT coexistence internally > in the 8821, but not in the 8812. Realtek is still working on getting a method > of handling that problem. None of the Realtek Bluetooth adaptors has a driver in > the kernel. Fixing that issue is my current project. > > Larry > Sir, thanks a lot for response. poma