Return-path: Received: from hofr.at ([212.69.189.236]:35180 "EHLO mail.hofr.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933155AbbCPOWX (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:22:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:22:20 +0100 From: Nicholas Mc Guire To: Kalle Valo Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Nicholas Mc Guire Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type Message-ID: <20150316142220.GA30229@opentech.at> (sfid-20150316_160241_028956_96A2B81C) References: <1426094076-10134-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> <87y4n0q1rq.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20150313173405.GB9934@opentech.at> <87a8zdowyo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <87a8zdowyo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Kalle Valo wrote: > Nicholas Mc Guire writes: > > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > >> Nicholas Mc Guire writes: > >> > >> > Return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int. > >> > An appropriately named unsigned long is added and the assignments fixed up. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire > >> > >> Doesn't apply: > >> > >> Applying: ath10k: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type > >> fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c). > >> Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge. > >> Cannot fall back to three-way merge. > >> Patch failed at 0001 ath10k: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type > >> > > sorry - no idea how I managed that - checking it. > > > > Will fix it up and repost. > > Did you use master branch from ath.git repository? ath10k is in quite > active development so if you use something else there's a substantial > risk that the patch will not apply. > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k/sources > no I was using linux-next - will switch to that branch for the ath10k related cleanups (although the one I posted today was the last from the completion fixup in ath10k - a few more in ath9k left). The failure of this patch was though due to a bad fix of a checkpatch warning - I alligned the original code rather than the replacement - updated my procedure so that re-applying the patch is the final check before sending out. thx! hofrat