Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:47943 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbbCPIdG (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:33:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1426494784.1935.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150316_093311_282616_992AAF34) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mac80211: Adjust chan_ctx when assigning reserved vif From: Johannes Berg To: Andrei Otcheretianski Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Emmanuel Grumbach , Luciano Coelho Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:33:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1426143210-25635-5-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> References: <1426143210-25635-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> <1426143210-25635-5-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:53 +0200, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > From: Andrei Otcheretianski > > It is possible to reserve a narrower channel context during csa (as long as > the chandefs are compatible). However when the reservation is used, the > channel context should be adjusted. Not doing so would result in attempts > to use higher rates than the chan_ctx supports. The commit log for this patch doesn't make any sense. I tried to make sense of it, even with Luca's help, but I can't - are you thinking about the min_def, which isn't really "the channel context" but just an auxiliary concept? I've applied all the other patches, but I rewrote the commit log for 7/7 (where I could figure out what you really meant) johannes