Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:25:09 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	=?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Luciano Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] wlcore: remove wl12xx_platform_data
Message-ID: <20150316212508.GI12397@atomide.com> (sfid-20150316_223006_133451_991AFBF6)
References: <1426162154-8716-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com>
 <201503162158.50587@pali>
 <20150316210143.GF12397@atomide.com>
 <201503162215.06436@pali>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <201503162215.06436@pali>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> [150316 14:15]:
> On Monday 16 March 2015 22:01:43 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> [150316 13:59]:
> > > On Monday 16 March 2015 16:29:39 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > I believe the last pending issues is the support for
> > > > ATAG_REVISION in device tree mode as posted by Pali.
> > > 
> > > No. In DT boot there is missing /proc/atags file (readable
> > > by userspace processes).
> > 
> > Oh OK thanks for the update.
> > 
> > > And also broken AES/SHA/MD5 support. Fix for crypto DT stuff
> > > I already sent.
> > 
> > But this is not a regression in mainline with legacy boot vs
> > device tree based booting, right? Sounds like it never worked
> > in the mainline or am thinking of some other set of patches?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Tony
> 
> In legacy board code are DMA channels defined. In DT files not. 
> So I think this is regression. Omap secure devices are broken in 
> both legacy & DT code, but non secure could work with legacy 
> code. But all devices booted with DT are broken.

OK I'll apply the DMA channels into omap-for-v4.0/fixes in
that case.

Regards,

Tony