Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:57793 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751520AbbCIIfv (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2015 04:35:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1425890148.1928.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150309_093559_389209_8B9CCE50) Subject: Re: [RFC v2] [RFC] mac80211: lock rate control From: Johannes Berg To: Sven Eckelmann Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:35:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1741038.iCoNEntVIV@bentobox> (sfid-20150309_093212_837963_F79703B8) References: <1425575237-5556-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <2736671.Y6Lt54SxyK@bentobox> <1425639348.3339.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1741038.iCoNEntVIV@bentobox> (sfid-20150309_093212_837963_F79703B8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 09:32 +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Friday 06 March 2015 11:55:48 Johannes Berg wrote: > > > I will just add following modification to your patch and ask for a new > > > test. > > > > Let me know how that goes :) > > I got a reply and they informed me that the test looked promising. The test > setup didn't crash and was running stable for hours. It looks like the extra > locking in rate_control_rate_init around ref->ops->rate_init was the missing > part in your patch that was necessary fix the problem for them. Great, thanks for testing. johannes