Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:54:18 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	=?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Luciano Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for
 pdata clocks
Message-ID: <20150320145417.GR31346@atomide.com> (sfid-20150320_155902_782908_ABE173DB)
References: <1426162154-8716-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com>
 <20150313150047.GI5264@atomide.com>
 <CAB3XZEcOytqpJ4pWoemLS3d+DCeA8C75MencDfGn_vhfEYrduw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3103538.jZ037SODdT@wuerfel>
 <87lhixphag.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
 <20150316151554.GO5264@atomide.com>
 <87siczg44w.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <87siczg44w.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

* Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> [150320 07:01]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes:
> 
> >> I prefer these going through the omap tree. Like Eliad said,
> >> drivers/net/wireless/ti does not get that many changes nowadays so the
> >> chances of this patchset conflicting with something is very small.
> >
> > OK great. In that case no need to rearrange the patches, I can
> > apply them into an immutable branch once the pending issues have
> > been fixed if Kalle acks them.
> >
> > To avoid merge conflicts that branch is easiest done against
> > v4.0-rc4. Kalle and Arnd, does that work for you guys?
> >
> > I can also base it on 5b7610f23562 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix wl12xx on
> > dm3730-evm with mainline u-boot") that's on top of -rc2 plus few
> > other fixes now merged to -rc4 mainline if we need a branch based
> > on an earlier tag.
> 
> Sorry, it seems I forgot to answer this one:
> 
> Either baseline is good for me, I can't think of any problems with
> either one. But please do remember that I'm a new maintainer, I might
> very well miss something ;)

OK, I'll base it on -rc4 unless Arnd needs something earlier.

Regards,

Tony