Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:33663 "EHLO mail-wg0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752934AbbCIIcN (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2015 04:32:13 -0400 Received: by wggz12 with SMTP id z12so6938395wgg.0 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 01:32:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Sven Eckelmann To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [RFC v2] [RFC] mac80211: lock rate control Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:32:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1741038.iCoNEntVIV@bentobox> (sfid-20150309_093217_573370_C3363CC7) In-Reply-To: <1425639348.3339.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1425575237-5556-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <2736671.Y6Lt54SxyK@bentobox> <1425639348.3339.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 06 March 2015 11:55:48 Johannes Berg wrote: > > I will just add following modification to your patch and ask for a new > > test. > > Let me know how that goes :) I got a reply and they informed me that the test looked promising. The test setup didn't crash and was running stable for hours. It looks like the extra locking in rate_control_rate_init around ref->ops->rate_init was the missing part in your patch that was necessary fix the problem for them. Kind regards, Sven