Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:62338 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752087AbbCOMJJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Mar 2015 08:09:09 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Eliad Peller , Tony Lindgren , Kalle Valo , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Sekhar Nori , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Cousson , Kumar Gala , Javier Martinez Canillas , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Luciano Coelho Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:08:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3103538.jZ037SODdT@wuerfel> (sfid-20150315_130915_508235_5ACCCA62) In-Reply-To: References: <1426162154-8716-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <20150313150047.GI5264@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday 15 March 2015 10:43:35 Eliad Peller wrote: > > > The other option would be to have the whole series in a immutable > > branch against v3.0-rc1 that can be merged into both wirelss tree > > and omap tree. > > > i think that could be easier. > > or maybe you can just take them all through the omap tree? the wlcore > tree is not under active development, so i don't expect conflicts > there. I'm fine with both these approaches. Arnd