Return-path: Received: from s72.web-hosting.com ([198.187.29.22]:51282 "EHLO s72.web-hosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038AbbCNARU (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:17:20 -0400 From: Sujith Manoharan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <21763.32496.935954.70693@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20150314_012116_698894_3122ADFC) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 05:51:04 +0530 To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ath9k patches In-Reply-To: <87wq2lqb1d.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1425891010-21522-1-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org> <87wq2lqb1d.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Kalle Valo wrote: > With these patches I got a new warning: > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_aic.c: In function 'ar9003_aic_cal_post_process': > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_aic.c:431:1: warning: the frame size of 1312 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] > > Is it a valid warning? When CONFIG_FRAME_WARN is set to 1024, this will be hit. On my machine, the value is 2048, so the stack doesn't overflow. But, 1024 could be a valid limit in some architectures, so I'll rework ar9003_aic_cal_post_process() to avoid using the stack excessively and post another series. Sujith