Return-path: Received: from dedo.coelho.fi ([88.198.205.34]:35459 "EHLO dedo.coelho.fi" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751468AbbD0FWJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 01:22:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1430112118.12579.2.camel@coelho.fi> (sfid-20150427_072213_630892_4B136610) From: Luca Coelho To: Kalle Valo Cc: Seth Forshee , Nuno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gon=E7alves?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:21:58 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87y4leqhu6.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <20150425190912.GA1706@ubuntu-xps13> <87y4leqhu6.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Ubuntu regulatory database Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 08:08 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Seth Forshee writes: > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 06:26:34PM +0100, Nuno Gonçalves wrote: > >> I was surprised that the wireless regdb provided with Ubuntu 15.04 is > >> almost 2 years old. > >> > >> Are you aware of the reason Ubuntu is not providing a updated regdb by default? > > > > This doesn't really seem on topic for the mailing list as it's a distro > > issue. > > > > But yes, it recently came to my attention that our distro package hadn't > > been updated in a while (I don't maintain the distro package and > > obviously wasn't paying close enough attention). It will be updated > > soon. > > Oh, so does this mean that the old regdb doesn't support 80 MHz > channels? Yeah, we had a bug reported from the community that turned out to be about this: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95901 -- Luca.