Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0147.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.147]:36500 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751869AbbEZRGW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 13:06:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1432659977.2846.100.camel@perches.com> (sfid-20150526_190626_929514_97526C35) Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8712u: Fix kernel warning for improper call of del_timer_sync() From: Joe Perches To: Greg KH Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , Dan Carpenter , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Sudip Mukherjee , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Stable , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Haggai Eran , Arek Rusniak , Larry Finger Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:06:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150526163555.GA9685@kroah.com> References: <556268BC.5050807@lwfinger.net> <20150525091737.GQ4150@mwanda> <1432575448.2846.63.camel@perches.com> <20150526044611.GA3465@sudip-PC> <1432616108.2846.83.camel@perches.com> <20150526050212.GC3465@sudip-PC> <1432616879.2846.86.camel@perches.com> <20150526141401.GC21573@kroah.com> <1432651739.2846.93.camel@perches.com> <20150526163555.GA9685@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 09:35 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:48:59AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > The main point is that patches shouldn't be applied without > > > > being submitted to a more widely read list. > > > > > > I take the blame for any problems with Outreachy patches. > > > > Are you going to change any procedure associated to these > > Outreachy patches? > > 2 bugs out of 900? Nah, I think that's good odds. > > Also, the outreachy patch process would overwhelm everyone else on the > list, it's really high volume during the application phase, I'd prefer > it to stick with the mentors that wish to help out with the process. If > you and/or Dan, or anyone else wishes to help out with this, I would > really appreciate it. But I don't think that forcing them to post to > the driverdevel list is a good idea. I don't think that's necessary, but sending them to any listed maintainer should be. If you're collecting them, I suggest you stick them in a separate branch, post them to your driverdev list and cc the appropriate maintainers, wait a week, then apply them to your main branch. You already batch post hundreds of patches for kernel x.y.z stable branches. What's another few hundred?