Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:36002 "EHLO
	mail-ob0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751493AbbFCCBj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:01:39 -0400
Message-ID: <556E6000.90402@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20150603_040144_325960_84792A06)
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 21:01:36 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
CC: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Kurn <kurn@sfu.ca>
Subject: New USB ID 2001:3c25
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Scott,

I see that you added the USB ID in the subject for the DWA-130 device in commit 
ea345c145ff23197eab34d0c4d0c8a93d7bea8c6.

Is there any reason that the new ID should not have been sent to Stable as well, 
or was that an oversight?

Thanks,

Larry