Return-path: Received: from canardo.mork.no ([148.122.252.1]:32852 "EHLO canardo.mork.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932487AbbFCTEM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:04:12 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Scott Branden , Larry Finger , linux-wireless , Stable , Andrew Kurn Subject: Re: New USB ID 2001:3c25 References: <556E6000.90402@lwfinger.net> <6A6FBA3BBCB70741B2E7FD80BFDD32DB2B33CF50@SJEXCHMB10.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <20150603175412.GA7362@1wt.eu> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:01:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150603175412.GA7362@1wt.eu> (Willy Tarreau's message of "Wed, 3 Jun 2015 19:54:12 +0200") Message-ID: <877frkfwga.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (sfid-20150603_210416_887703_4D4A2A86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Willy Tarreau writes: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:50:49PM +0000, Scott Branden wrote: >> Hi Larry, >> >> There is no problem applying this patch to the stable tree. >> I didn't know it was my responsibility to inform the stable mailing list every time a patch is accepted >> in the latest kernel that could be applied to the stable tree? > > Just adding a Cc: stable@... in the commit message is enough to get it > automatically queued once applied. Please check SubmittingPatches and > stable_kernel_rules.txt for more information. It isn't absolutely clear to me that those rules applies to "wireless", being a sub-subsystem of "net". Quoting from stable_kernel_rules.txt : "- If the patch covers files in net/ or drivers/net please follow netdev stable submission guidelines as described in Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt" And the netdev-FAQ.txt goes into great detail describing the procedure, which basically is "Give davem a hint that the patch should go to stable". (and I'd like to note that this works very well in practice). But I have noticed that some stable patches seem to flow more directly into stable from "wireless" than from the rest of "net". I just don't think the current _written_ docs support that procedure. Those docs are possibly wrong? You should probably know much better than me :) Bjørn