Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]:36763 "EHLO mail-ig0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751035AbbGBLvN (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2015 07:51:13 -0400 Received: by igrv9 with SMTP id v9so94498800igr.1 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 04:51:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1435837168.2285.8.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1435082418.2777.11.camel@ipeer-box> <1435822032.2285.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1435837168.2285.8.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Krishna Chaitanya Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:20:53 +0530 Message-ID: (sfid-20150702_135116_909105_3370B24D) Subject: Re: AP + P2P_GO multichan tests with intel7260 as a P2P_CLIENT - direct probe issue To: Johannes Berg Cc: Janusz Dziedzic , "Peer, Ilan" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 11:44 +0200, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: >> >> > The issue above can probably easily fixed by doing the BSS update >> > after >> > the "direct probe responded" though, no? Like this: >> > https://p.sipsolutions.net/67f9212f0f9f3642.txt >> > >> This was my first idea, but in such case I suspect we will send >> another direct probe while bss->proberesp_ies will be not set and >> ieee80211_probe_auth() will send second probe_req? Yes, if the seuqnce number is not set the second probe resp also gets dropped. > But why would it not be set? We do rely on ieee80211_rx_bss_info() > setting it, after all. The probe resp is dropped early in the rx_path so this call is not made.