Return-path: Received: from server11.hostfactory.ch ([62.146.13.133]:48104 "EHLO server11.hostfactory.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934322AbbGVQiF (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:38:05 -0400 Message-ID: <55AFC6E1.7060706@weiss.ch> (sfid-20150722_183812_982601_8E5CC0B4) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:37:53 +0200 From: Rolf Anderegg Reply-To: rolf.anderegg@weiss.ch MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oleksij Rempel , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: ath9k_htc: virtual interfaces, AP connection drop & kernel warning References: <559D41B3.4050604@weiss.ch> <559F9AF8.5000208@rempel-privat.de> <55A3A672.1060502@weiss.ch> <55A79B5C.7010501@rempel-privat.de> In-Reply-To: <55A79B5C.7010501@rempel-privat.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16/07/15 13:54, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Am 13.07.2015 um 13:52 schrieb Rolf Anderegg: >> >> I suspect that there are bandwidth/speed issues when dealing with USB >> adapters, but that does not inherently mean that the connection is prone >> to drop, right? Doesn't that mean that I am leaking packages somewhere >> along the way? What else could I be looking for? > > The packages can drop if you will do channel scan. STA mode need some > seconds to complete channel scan. It means AP will be all the time > unavailable. Ok, that may be. Then again why am I not experiencing the same connection drop on my ath5k setup? Because the channel scan is more likely to be completed in due time? Regards, Rolf Anderegg