Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message
 body
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>,
	Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Chris Park <chris.park@atmel.com>,
	Dean Lee <dean.lee@atmel.com>,
	Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@atmel.com>,
	Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@atmel.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <559B85CD.6040200@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAH6sp9Npqma18pj=ZsxYpCNDCm-AjjXvw61MGKBEKSYvg_LUBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <559BBDD6.7040808@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAH6sp9O=NgJXOJzQaaA0o_yae+ae1oJa5Kcqmpo-WWBO_xUW+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <559BFB19.2080700@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAGRGNgXTN8AxBNNfie4KvvErOXm3LUyL_QLLWQ6TN_wJgJkD-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <559CCC9D.8050606@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAGRGNgWcHxwjx07A45No8vArXR12JGKcfif1Rvi30PQbJs4SGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <559CED4C.1080402@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAGRGNgU1SSUw-97aS0nhFObcMpLPdP3ej9WWNVwN77Fd=ws-bQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150708150335.GB20551@thunk.org>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <559D416A.7050601@users.sourceforge.net> (sfid-20150708_172824_024370_ADECD36E)
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:27:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150708150335.GB20551@thunk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

> Note also that some maintainers have work flow that deliberately smash
> the date (i.e., because they are using a system such as guilt),
> so if you are depending on the submitted timestamp, it's going to
> break on you.

Thanks for your hint.

I am just trying to offer the possibility for the reuse of a more
precise commit timestamp together with an appropriate author mail
address for my update suggestions.
Do you reject any more such message field overrides?

Regards,
Markus