Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:35721 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752252AbbG2OWZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:22:25 -0400 Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so203724598wib.0 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:22:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <874mkn71ls.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <871tfr8ne9.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <874mkn71ls.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:22:24 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20150729_162229_173768_D77F7AD0) Subject: Re: QCA6174 hw2.1 irq_mode=0 broken on 4.2-rc3, working on 4.1.2 From: Enrico Tagliavini To: Kalle Valo Cc: Michal Kazior , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sound! I'll keep a copy of the log then. If the bisect on ath10k folder will lead nowhere I'll see if I can make it over the whole tree. At least by doing it on the ath10k tree I hope to narrow down the number of commit. Ok then I'll use Linus' master, no problem with this. I hope to at least get started this weekend. On 29 July 2015 at 11:30, Kalle Valo wrote: > Enrico Tagliavini writes: > >> Yeah that's what I meant. My idea was to first bisect only the ath10k >> directory, so restricting the bisect on the commits touching stuff >> there. I guess if the issue is more broad it will come up somewhere >> else as well, so this is a good starting point, I hope. Thank you for >> pointing it out though, this will actually be the first time I do a >> proper bisect. > > And remember to always to mention if you have restricted the bisect > somehow, that's important information. And better if you provide 'git > bisect log' output as well. > >> Also do you want me to bisect Kalle's sources or Linus' master? By >> what Michał said I guess Kalle's but I ask to be sure. >> >> Also to be clear: I'm using Linus' sources at the moment, as provided >> by Fedora rawhide. >> >> For me it's the same, so let me know what you prefer and is more >> useful to solve this issue. > > Good that you brought this up. As ath.git master branch gets rebased > every rc1 release you really cannot use that for bisect. Either you > should use ath.git ath-next branch or Linus' tree. To be on the safe > side I always recommend to use Linus' tree if at all possible. > > -- > Kalle Valo