Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:38081 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750961AbbG2F2V convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:28:21 -0400 Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so9797964wib.1 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 22:28:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:28:19 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20150729_072824_890391_2DB84066) Subject: Re: QCA6174 hw2.1 irq_mode=0 broken on 4.2-rc3, working on 4.1.2 From: Michal Kazior To: Enrico Tagliavini Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 28 July 2015 at 16:57, Enrico Tagliavini wrote: > I was testing the kernel from Fedora rawhide to test some issue > related to the sound card. So this is 4.2 rc3 as released by Linus > plus some Fedora patch. Nothing related to ath10k as far as I can see. > > Bisecting would require a lot of time. I'm doing the full RPM package, > including modules signature and so on and I'm doing this in my free > time. I understand. > This wont work for bisecting. I have to setup something else. Is > it ok if I restrict the bisect on the ath10k tree? That has enough > commit already to begin with, plus I'm going to be on the road in less > than two weeks. As long as you establish a working and a non-working commit id on kvalo tree it should be fine I guess. Michał