Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:37789 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932620AbbI1Mhf (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:37:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1443443851.2401.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150928_143738_878946_8C7B66BE) Subject: Re: Low latency communication over wifi From: Johannes Berg To: Bastian Bittorf Cc: Pavel Machek , jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com, mcgrof@do-not-panic.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:37:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150928121504.GE22537@medion.lan> References: <20150926102403.GA21555@amd> <1443426103.2401.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20150928121504.GE22537@medion.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 14:15 +0200, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * Johannes Berg [28.09.2015 14:00]: > > > > # you have to add some magic for matching your data > > > > e.g. $IPT -t mangle -I OUTPUT -j DSCP --set-dscp-class CS7 > > > > > > Again, this is ping -Q equivalent, right? I was doing > > > > Yes. > > IMHO this is not the same: you have to do it on both ends. > (also the iptables thingy) > Depends what you're measuring, but ping should apply the same DSCP tag on the response I believe. johannes