Return-path: Received: from s72.web-hosting.com ([198.187.29.22]:40754 "EHLO s72.web-hosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753253AbbIWNOr (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:14:47 -0400 From: Sujith Manoharan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <22018.42528.871404.504088@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20150923_151450_818769_331BCC0B) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:46:16 +0530 To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: use ether_addr_copy() instead of memcpy() In-Reply-To: <1442931866-17115-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> References: <87lhbylifx.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <1442931866-17115-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) Both the arguments for ether_addr_copy() need to be aligned. Is this the case for all the replacements in this patch ? Sujith