Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:54680 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751091AbbIGIxg (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2015 04:53:36 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Jes Sorensen Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] rtl8xxxu (mac80211) driver for rtl8188[cr]u/rtl8192cu/rtl8723au References: <1440968574-29490-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <87y4gjfw10.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:53:29 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Jes Sorensen's message of "Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:24:38 -0400") Message-ID: <87h9n6fw52.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20150907_105339_759075_81F36220) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jes Sorensen writes: >>> Also how do we make sure that distros don't enable >>> CONFIG_RTL8XXXU_UNTESTED? They are notarious of enabling kconfig options >>> without thinking. >> >> Some distros enable staging whether you ask them or not. I think >> CONFIG_RTL8XXXYU_UNTESTED is pretty safe and will most likely just work >> for the devices on that list, but the driver will spit out a warning >> asking the person to report test results to me. > > Just one more note - we could put UNTESTED under EXPERIMENTAL I think that's a good idea. Does anyone know if the distros use features which depend on EXPERIMENTAL? I hope not. -- Kalle Valo