Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:53209 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751272AbbIPAIY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:08:24 -0400 From: greearb@candelatech.com To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ben Greear Subject: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix CCK rate definitions. Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:08:18 -0700 Message-Id: <1442362098-24859-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> (sfid-20150916_020827_559309_04D3FC21) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ben Greear The old values did NOT match what is found in 10.1.467 firmware. I figure it is likely it is wrong for the others as well. Signed-off-by: Ben Greear --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h index 4c5eee4..710ca32 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h @@ -202,13 +202,13 @@ enum ath10k_hw_rate_ofdm { }; enum ath10k_hw_rate_cck { - ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_11M = 0, - ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_5_5M, - ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_2M, - ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_1M, - ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_SP_11M, - ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_SP_5_5M, - ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_SP_2M, + ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_11M = 0x40, + ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_5_5M = 0x41, + ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_2M = 0x42, + ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_1M = 0x43, + ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_SP_11M = ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_11M | 0x4, + ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_SP_5_5M = ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_5_5M | 0x4, + ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_SP_2M = ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_2M | 0x4, }; /* Target specific defines for MAIN firmware */ -- 2.4.3