Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:39246 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932079AbbI1Rms (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:42:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1443462165.2401.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150928_194251_442018_CC7C4CB4) Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for South Africa (ZA) on 5GHz From: Johannes Berg To: Seth Forshee , Karl =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?= Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:42:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150928160741.GA25936@ubuntu-hedt> (sfid-20150928_180803_494069_1D6E674B) References: <9BEBB87E-EA6D-4219-ADC5-40C1E19DA5DA@excors.net> <1443426260.2401.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20150928160741.GA25936@ubuntu-hedt> (sfid-20150928_180803_494069_1D6E674B) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 11:07 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:44:20AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > The bands don’t quite match up and DFS/TPC is (apparently) not > > > required for 5470 - 5725. More importantly, the max transmitted > > > power > > > seems to be 1W/30dBm e.i.r.p and not 27dBm. > > > > Without checking now, just a note: we sometimes have lower limits > > here > > due to spectral power density, indoor/outdoor or TPC requirements. > > One of the documents says that the TPC requirement for that range was > lifted in March 2015, so if it was lowered for TPC then we may be > able to bump it up to 30 dBm. > That's very well possible then - the typical TCP requirement is "1/2 of the power w/o TPC", which would match the 3dB johannes