Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:36229 "EHLO mail-io0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755127AbbJAAJt (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:09:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1443639852.1859.25.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1443637937.1859.19.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1443639852.1859.25.camel@sipsolutions.net> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:09:48 -0400 Message-ID: (sfid-20151001_021059_980846_BB9E9476) Subject: Re: Rate limiting AP bandwidth change messages in ieee80211_config_bw? From: Josh Boyer To: Johannes Berg Cc: drago01 , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , netdev , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> >> I'm not sure ratelimiting it would even work - it's not *that* high >> frequency? Not really sure though. >> >> I think we can do either, it's not such a terribly important message as >> far as I can tell. >> > > Seems like Emmanuel would like to see the message stay in some form - For what purpose? Or rather, when a user sees this in their dmesg, what are they supposed to do about it? > perhaps we should try rate limiting it then? Could you check if that > actually works? I'll think on it, sure. I was hoping sdata_dbg would be sufficient because it's much easier, but if there's value in the message I can look at limiting it in some fashion. josh