Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:34027 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751334AbbJRToV (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:44:21 -0400 Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so25087719wik.1 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:44:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151015180408.GA31612@ubuntu-hedt> References: <1444761084-4399-1-git-send-email-andrej.vlasic0@gmail.com> <20151015180408.GA31612@ubuntu-hedt> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:44:19 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20151018_214425_506373_59867792) Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Croatia (HR) From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVqIFZsYcWhacSH?= To: Seth Forshee Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15 October 2015 at 20:04, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:31:24PM +0200, Andrej Vlasic wrote: >> Update frequency allocation rules to mach data from table [1]. >> >> Also increase allowed power limit for range 5150-5250 Mhz to 200mW. >> >> [1] http://tablice.hakom.hr:8280/vis?lang=en >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrej Vlasic >> --- >> db.txt | 14 ++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt >> index d57ea84..3b36616 100644 >> --- a/db.txt >> +++ b/db.txt >> @@ -504,11 +504,17 @@ country HN: DFS-FCC >> (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (24), DFS >> (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) >> >> +# Data from table of frequency allocations: http://tablice.hakom.hr:8280/vis?lang=en >> +# For 5ghz range see http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_85.pdf >> +# and http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_86.pdf >> +# and http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_87.pdf >> +# TPC devices on range 5250-5350 can use 200mW, and 1W on range 5470-5725. >> + >> country HR: DFS-ETSI >> - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) >> - (5170 - 5250 @ 80), (20), AUTO-BW >> - (5250 - 5330 @ 80), (20), DFS, AUTO-BW >> - (5490 - 5710 @ 160), (27), DFS >> + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW) >> + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW >> + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW >> + (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS >> # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 >> (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > > In general the changes look okay to me and in line with the published > regulations (I couldn't read some of the documents you linked to, but > the limits do look to be in line with ERC/DEC/(01)07 and ECC/DEC/(04)08 > which are referenced by the frequency allocation table). > > It seems pretty arbitrary to change from dBm to mW however, especially > for those rules whose power limit isn't actually changing. I'd prefer we > leave them in dBm for consistency, in which case I think we end up with: > > country HR: DFS-ETSI > (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (20) > (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW > (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW > (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (27), DFS > # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 > (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > > If that looks fine to you then I can fix it up when I apply the patch. It's fine with me too like that. > > Thanks, > Seth