Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:22783 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781AbbJWG5U (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 02:57:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:57:03 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Glen Lee Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, austin.shin@atmel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas.FERRE@atmel.com, adel.noureldin@atmel.com, tony.cho@atmel.com, leo.kim@atmel.com, adham.abozaeid@atmel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] staging: wilc1000: wilc_handle_isr: add argument wilc to wilc_handle_isr Message-ID: <20151023065703.GV7340@mwanda> (sfid-20151023_085746_610879_3A9BE0BB) References: <1445578124-31486-1-git-send-email-glen.lee@atmel.com> <1445578124-31486-5-git-send-email-glen.lee@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1445578124-31486-5-git-send-email-glen.lee@atmel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:28:21PM +0900, Glen Lee wrote: > This patch add new argument wilc to wilc_handle_isr and pass wilc to > the function. It's not important enough to redo the patch but why are we sometimes using "wl" and sometimes "wilc"? regards, dan carpenter