Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35558 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752029AbbJWR0a (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:26:30 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Xose Vazquez Perez , linux-wireless , Larry Finger Subject: Re: overlap of devices in rtl8xxxu and rtl8192cu References: <562A2711.9040700@gmail.com> <87ziz91xag.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87oafp1pk6.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 20:26:21 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87oafp1pk6.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (Kalle Valo's message of "Fri, 23 Oct 2015 20:07:37 +0300") Message-ID: <87k2qd1ooy.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20151023_192633_173135_D8986E76) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Kalle Valo writes: > Like I said earlier in rtl8xxxu review, I don't want to have two drivers > supporting the same device. So either rtl8xxxu or rtlwifi supports the > devices above, not both. And to my knowledge rtl8xxxu is still lacking > in features, and it's a new driver, so it's best that rtlwifi continues > to support these for the time being. Once rtl8xxxu catches up and we > have a clear consensus we can make the switch. > > I'll send a patch in a jiffy, merge window is getting closer so we don't > have any extra time. Heh, having hilarious problems with my patch: : host vger.kernel.org[209.132.180.67] said: 550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The capital Triple-X in subject is way too often associated with junk email, please rephrase. The subject was: Subject: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: move devices supported by rtlwifi under CONFIG_RTL8XXXU_UNTESTED -- Kalle Valo