Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]:36558 "EHLO mail-ig0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538AbbJENgr (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:36:47 -0400 Received: by igcrk20 with SMTP id rk20so60705462igc.1 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:36:07 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: wireless-regdb , linux-wireless Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] wireless-regdb: Update TW and US rules to latest regulations Message-ID: <20151005133607.GA21639@ubuntu-hedt> (sfid-20151005_153650_846556_974DBBC9) References: <1443682667-29814-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <20151001212601.GE101875@ubuntu-hedt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:28:22PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Seth Forshee wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:57:42PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> Hi Seth, > >> > >> This is v3 of my TW/US 5GHz updates series. Sorry for the long delay. > >> > >> Changes since v2: > >> > >> - Moved the US U-NII-1 (5150 ~ 5250 MHz) patch in front of the TW patch > >> > >> - Drop U-NII-1 power limit from 24 dBm to 23 dBm, to be on the safe > >> side of 250mW > >> > >> > >> Patch 1 updates the 5470 ~ 5725 MHz rules for Taiwan, specifically > >> the opening up of 5600 ~ 5650 MHz spectrum previously allocated to > >> weather radars. The transmission power limit is also corrected to > >> match the regulations. > >> > >> Patch 2 changes the boundary frequencies for each rule for Taiwan to > >> match the frequency allocation table. The "regulation" database shouldn't > >> care about artificial channel boundaries. > >> > >> Patch 3 updates the transmission power limits for 5150 ~ 5250 MHz for > >> the US. > >> > >> Patch 4 adds the previously unusable 5150 ~ 5250 MHz band for Taiwan. > >> > >> Patch 5 updates the transmission power limits for Taiwan, per the NCC's > >> official reply. This patch may be slightly controversial, as there is > >> no official English document. Either someone will have to independently > >> verify this, or translate the Chinese document. > > > > This description doesn't quite match the patches. Patch 4 both adds the > > 5150-5250 MHz band and increases the power limits for 5250-5350 MHz, > > whereas patch 5 changes the DFS master region to DFS-FCC. Previously the > > increased power limit for 5250-5350 MHz was part of patch 5 - perhaps > > you accidentally moved that part to patch 4 when you were updating the > > patches? > > Indeed. I squashed a fixup into the wrong patch, and tried to fix it. > Obviously that didn't work out so well. > > > So patches 1-3 look fine to me. I suspect you'll want to move the power > > limit increase from patch 4 to 5. I'm also going to take a look at a > > machine translation of the Chinese document, and if that looks to be in > > agreement with your patches then I should be able to apply them next > > week sometime. > > Do you want me to send a new version now, or wait for you to go through > the translation first? I've taken a look at the translation, and as far as I can tell what you've done looks okay. So go ahead and resend, and as long as no one else finds a problem I'll apply all 5. Thanks, Seth