Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47154 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753175AbbJWRxZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:53:25 -0400 From: Jes Sorensen To: Kalle Valo Cc: Xose Vazquez Perez , linux-wireless , Larry Finger Subject: Re: overlap of devices in rtl8xxxu and rtl8192cu References: <562A2711.9040700@gmail.com> <87ziz91xag.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87oafp1pk6.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87k2qd1ooy.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:53:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k2qd1ooy.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (Kalle Valo's message of "Fri, 23 Oct 2015 20:26:21 +0300") Message-ID: (sfid-20151023_195331_118200_A525EA31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Kalle Valo writes: > Kalle Valo writes: > >> Like I said earlier in rtl8xxxu review, I don't want to have two drivers >> supporting the same device. So either rtl8xxxu or rtlwifi supports the >> devices above, not both. And to my knowledge rtl8xxxu is still lacking >> in features, and it's a new driver, so it's best that rtlwifi continues >> to support these for the time being. Once rtl8xxxu catches up and we >> have a clear consensus we can make the switch. >> >> I'll send a patch in a jiffy, merge window is getting closer so we don't >> have any extra time. > > Heh, having hilarious problems with my patch: > > : host vger.kernel.org[209.132.180.67] said: > 550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The capital Triple-X in subject is way > too often associated with junk email, please rephrase. > > The subject was: > > Subject: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: move devices supported by rtlwifi under > CONFIG_RTL8XXXU_UNTESTED This seems a reasonable workaround for now. Next time just add some extra buzzwords to the subject line and I am sure it will go through :) Jes